PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPN.L is traded in GBp, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IJPN.L having a 16.83% return and IJPA.L slightly lower at 16.15%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJPN.L having a 10.48% annualized return and IJPA.L not far behind at 10.12%.


IJPN.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.24%
YTD
16.83%
6M
16.02%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.48%

IJPA.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
6.14%
YTD
16.15%
6M
15.80%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPN.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
16.83%18.18%9.39%14.03%-7.13%2.20%12.46%14.55%-8.45%13.27%
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc
16.15%18.21%8.48%13.38%-6.19%1.11%11.60%13.95%-9.06%14.95%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPN.L and IJPA.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009

0.83

The correlation between IJPN.L and IJPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJPN.L
IJPA.L

Industrials

24.8%
25.2%

Technology

20.3%
19.8%

Financial Services

18.2%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
12.2%

Communication Services

8.7%
5.7%

Healthcare

5.9%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.0%

Basic Materials

2.9%
5.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
3.0%

Utilities

1.0%
1.2%

Energy

1.0%
0.9%

Industrials

IJPN.L
24.8%
IJPA.L
25.2%

Technology

IJPN.L
20.3%
IJPA.L
19.8%

Financial Services

IJPN.L
18.2%
IJPA.L
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IJPN.L
11.9%
IJPA.L
12.2%

Communication Services

IJPN.L
8.7%
IJPA.L
5.7%

Healthcare

IJPN.L
5.9%
IJPA.L
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

IJPN.L
3.5%
IJPA.L
4.0%

Basic Materials

IJPN.L
2.9%
IJPA.L
5.1%

Real Estate

IJPN.L
1.9%
IJPA.L
3.0%

Utilities

IJPN.L
1.0%
IJPA.L
1.2%

Energy

IJPN.L
1.0%
IJPA.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPN.L
IJPN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IJPN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPA.L
IJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJPN.LIJPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

3.16

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

10.36

+0.15

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPN.L and IJPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJPN.LIJPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.81

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.54

-0.12

Drawdowns

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, which is greater than IJPA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPN.L and IJPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPN.LIJPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.73%

-25.10%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-10.63%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.09%

-13.21%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.57%

-18.93%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.34%

-25.10%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.05%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-6.35%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

3.25%

+0.07%

Volatility

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) is 3.88%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that IJPN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPN.LIJPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

4.11%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.00%

15.54%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

18.61%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.16%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.58%

-0.60%

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPN.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPN.L vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison

IJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while IJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IJPN.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.03%2.25%1.95%1.81%2.10%1.66%1.75%1.90%1.89%1.53%1.55%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IJPN.L and IJPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IJPN.L.

IJPN.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IJPN.L and 0.12% for IJPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPN.L and IJPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer