IJPN.L vs. IITU.L
IJPN.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IJPN.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJPN.L returned 10.48%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJPN.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJPN.L achieves a 16.83% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPN.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 10.48%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
IJPN.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 6.24%
- YTD
- 16.83%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- 34.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPN.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 16.83% | 18.18% | 9.39% | 14.03% | -7.13% | 2.20% | 12.46% | 14.55% | -8.45% | 13.27% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPN.L and IITU.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.55 |
The correlation between IJPN.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJPN.L
IITU.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
IJPN.L
IITU.L
Technology
IJPN.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Real Estate
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
IJPN.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
IJPN.L
IITU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IJPN.L
IITU.L
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJPN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 3.17 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 8.17 | +2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJPN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.71 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.16 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.28 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.23 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPN.L drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPN.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJPN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.73% | -28.03% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -16.76% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | -28.03% | +13.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.57% | -28.03% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.34% | -28.03% | +3.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -2.89% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -5.14% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 6.51% | -3.19% |
Volatility
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) is 3.88%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that IJPN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJPN.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 7.01% | -3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 14.45% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 19.60% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 21.94% | -6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 21.31% | -5.33% |
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPN.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJPN.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
IJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJPN.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.03% | 2.25% | 1.95% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.90% | 1.89% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJPN.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IJPN.L.
IJPN.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IJPN.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IJPN.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for IJPN.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer