IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) and RBTX.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IJPH.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while RBTX.L is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IJPH.L returned 20.46%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for RBTX.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IJPH.L charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RBTX.L.

Performance

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while RBTX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RBTX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 20.84% return, which is significantly lower than RBTX.L's 32.14% return.

IJPH.L

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 20.84%
• 6M: 20.67%
• 1Y: 53.19%
• 3Y*: 26.82%
• 5Y*: 20.46%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

RBTX.L

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: 8.29%
• YTD: 32.14%
• 6M: 32.00%
• 1Y: 50.78%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: 12.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF	20.84%	29.37%	23.82%	34.19%	-4.30%	11.94%	9.27%	15.94%	-15.89%	19.45%
RBTX.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	32.14%	9.17%	7.51%	32.05%	-26.55%	22.26%	35.08%	32.52%	-13.97%	34.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPH.L and RBTX.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2016	0.64

The correlation between IJPH.L and RBTX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IJPH.L	RBTX.L
Industrials	26.0%	26.6%
Technology	19.1%	71.2%
Financial Services	17.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	0.1%
Communication Services	7.9%	-
Healthcare	6.3%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.0%	0.1%
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Energy	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPH.L

IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RBTX.L

RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IJPH.L	RBTX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.30	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	3.18	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.39	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.49	3.86	+1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.28	11.29	+7.98

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPH.L and RBTX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, roughly equal to the maximum RBTX.L drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and RBTX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IJPH.L	RBTX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.55%	-33.46%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-13.10%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.95%	-27.28%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-33.46%	+11.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.46%	-9.59%	+2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	4.48%	-1.73%

Volatility

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) is 4.93%, while iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that IJPH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBTX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IJPH.L	RBTX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	9.28%	-4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	17.74%	-1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.36%	22.02%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.12%	25.33%	-6.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	24.51%	-5.29%

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPH.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RBTX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IJPH.L vs. RBTX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPH.L nor RBTX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IJPH.L and RBTX.L in my portfolio?

IJPH.L and RBTX.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IJPH.L or RBTX.L?

On fees, RBTX.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IJPH.L or RBTX.L?

RBTX.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.

What is the main difference between IJPH.L and RBTX.L?

IJPH.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while RBTX.L is Robotics. IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while RBTX.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPH.L and 0.40% for RBTX.L.