PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while PAJS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PAJS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 22.24% return, which is significantly lower than PAJS.L's 10,896.66% return.


IJPH.L

1D
0.75%
1M
3.44%
YTD
22.24%
6M
22.61%
1Y
54.54%
3Y*
28.44%
5Y*
20.86%
10Y*
16.48%

PAJS.L

1D
0.63%
1M
10,142.59%
YTD
10,896.66%
6M
10,944.36%
1Y
22.79%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
22.24%29.37%23.82%34.19%-4.30%2.36%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
10,896.66%-98.87%0.76%8.67%-13.67%-28.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPH.L and PAJS.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.70

The correlation between IJPH.L and PAJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPH.L
IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJPH.LPAJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-279.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

90.12

-88.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

0.23

+5.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.56

0.47

+19.09

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPH.L and PAJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum PAJS.L drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and PAJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPH.LPAJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-99.32%

+64.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-99.06%

+89.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.95%

-99.06%

+77.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-15.98%

+12.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-35.96%

+28.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

48.77%

-45.99%

Volatility

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) is 6.69%, while Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) has a volatility of 460.73%. This indicates that IJPH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPH.LPAJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

460.73%

-454.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

1,306.92%

-1,290.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

27,873.17%

-27,852.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.20%

13,204.53%

-13,185.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

13,204.53%

-13,185.48%

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPH.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PAJS.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPH.L vs. PAJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPH.L nor PAJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPH.L and PAJS.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAJS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAJS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.

IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while PAJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPH.L and 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and PAJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer