PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while IJPE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IJPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly higher than IJPE.L's 18.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJPH.L having a 14.77% annualized return and IJPE.L not far ahead at 14.88%.


IJPH.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
6.95%
YTD
19.91%
6M
21.68%
1Y
52.45%
3Y*
28.46%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
14.77%

IJPE.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
6.93%
YTD
18.01%
6M
19.21%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
26.63%
5Y*
19.09%
10Y*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
19.91%29.38%23.82%34.19%-4.30%11.94%9.27%15.95%-15.90%19.46%
IJPE.L
iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
18.01%34.15%16.52%30.17%-0.54%4.85%15.09%8.84%-16.11%23.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPH.L and IJPE.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2012

0.89

The correlation between IJPH.L and IJPE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJPH.L
IJPE.L

Industrials

26.0%
26.0%

Technology

19.1%
19.1%

Financial Services

17.5%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.2%

Communication Services

7.9%
7.9%

Healthcare

6.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.3%

Utilities

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

1.1%
1.1%

Industrials

IJPH.L
26.0%
IJPE.L
26.0%

Technology

IJPH.L
19.1%
IJPE.L
19.1%

Financial Services

IJPH.L
17.5%
IJPE.L
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IJPH.L
12.2%
IJPE.L
12.2%

Communication Services

IJPH.L
7.9%
IJPE.L
7.9%

Healthcare

IJPH.L
6.3%
IJPE.L
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

IJPH.L
3.6%
IJPE.L
3.6%

Basic Materials

IJPH.L
3.0%
IJPE.L
3.0%

Real Estate

IJPH.L
2.3%
IJPE.L
2.3%

Utilities

IJPH.L
1.1%
IJPE.L
1.1%

Energy

IJPH.L
1.1%
IJPE.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPH.L
IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPE.L
IJPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IJPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJPH.LIJPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.51

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

4.99

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.27

16.72

+2.55

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the IJPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPH.L and IJPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJPH.LIJPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.75

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.79

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.55

+0.18

Drawdowns

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, roughly equal to the maximum IJPE.L drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and IJPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPH.LIJPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-33.89%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-10.61%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.95%

-20.17%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-20.17%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-33.89%

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.29%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-8.51%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

3.18%

-0.47%

Volatility

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) is 3.51%, while iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPE.L) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that IJPH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPH.LIJPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.89%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.39%

15.06%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.98%

19.29%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

18.65%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

18.81%

+0.43%

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IJPH.L and IJPE.L have an expense ratio of 0.64%.


Dividends

IJPH.L vs. IJPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPH.L nor IJPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IJPH.L and IJPE.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.64% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPH.L and IJPE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.64% per year.

IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while IJPE.L tracks MSCI Japan Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and IJPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer