IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L
IJPH.L (iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF) and DXJP.L (WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged) are both Japan Equities funds - IJPH.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index while DXJP.L tracks the WisdomTree Japan Equity Index (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L returned 14.77%/yr vs 16.93%/yr for DXJP.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJPH.L charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DXJP.L.
Performance
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while DXJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DXJP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IJPH.L having a 19.91% return and DXJP.L slightly higher at 20.87%. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L has underperformed DXJP.L with an annualized return of 14.77%, while DXJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.93% annualized return.
IJPH.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 6M
- 21.81%
- 1Y
- 53.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.77%
DXJP.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 20.87%
- 6M
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 56.54%
- 3Y*
- 33.50%
- 5Y*
- 25.49%
- 10Y*
- 16.93%
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 19.91% | 29.38% | 23.82% | 34.19% | -4.30% | 11.94% | 9.27% | 15.95% | -15.90% | 19.46% |
DXJP.L WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | 20.87% | 33.41% | 28.49% | 40.34% | 4.78% | 16.94% | 3.19% | 14.23% | -20.57% | 20.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPH.L and DXJP.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IJPH.L and DXJP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Technology
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Financial Services
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Consumer Cyclical
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Communication Services
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Healthcare
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Consumer Defensive
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Basic Materials
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Real Estate
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
-
Utilities
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
-
Energy
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L — Risk / Return Rank
IJPH.L
DXJP.L
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJPH.L | DXJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.53 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.41 | 5.60 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.27 | 19.40 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJPH.L | DXJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.96 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.34 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.87 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.69 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, smaller than the maximum DXJP.L drawdown of -41.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and DXJP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJPH.L | DXJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -41.75% | +7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -10.06% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | -22.88% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -22.88% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -41.75% | +7.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | 0.00% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -8.44% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.91% | -0.20% |
Volatility
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) is 3.51%, while WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that IJPH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJPH.L | DXJP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 4.24% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 15.02% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 19.06% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 19.04% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 19.44% | -0.20% |
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPH.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJPH.L vs. DXJP.L - Dividend Comparison
IJPH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJP.L WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | 1.40% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.92% | 2.49% | 1.62% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.41% | 1.34% | 0.62% |
IJPH.L iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IJPH.L and DXJP.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXJP.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXJP.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.
IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while DXJP.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Equity Index (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPH.L and 0.45% for DXJP.L.
Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and DXJP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer