PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF JPY Acc (DXJG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IJPH.L is traded in GBP, while DXJG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DXJG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJPH.L achieves a 19.91% return, which is significantly higher than DXJG.L's 17.18% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPH.L has outperformed DXJG.L with an annualized return of 14.77%, while DXJG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.


IJPH.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.15%
YTD
19.91%
6M
21.81%
1Y
53.07%
3Y*
28.46%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
14.77%

DXJG.L

1D
0.25%
1M
6.33%
YTD
17.18%
6M
17.52%
1Y
36.74%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
14.28%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJPH.L
iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
19.91%29.38%23.82%34.19%-4.30%11.94%9.27%15.95%-15.90%19.46%
DXJG.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF JPY Acc
17.18%19.87%13.08%18.87%1.09%6.32%5.73%12.68%-13.96%14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IJPH.L and DXJG.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2015

0.72

The correlation between IJPH.L and DXJG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJPH.L
DXJG.L

Industrials

26.0%
28.3%

Technology

19.1%
12.8%

Financial Services

17.5%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
16.4%

Communication Services

7.9%
4.0%

Healthcare

6.3%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.0%
7.5%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Utilities

1.1%

-

Energy

1.1%
2.0%

Industrials

IJPH.L
26.0%
DXJG.L
28.3%

Technology

IJPH.L
19.1%
DXJG.L
12.8%

Financial Services

IJPH.L
17.5%
DXJG.L
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IJPH.L
12.2%
DXJG.L
16.4%

Communication Services

IJPH.L
7.9%
DXJG.L
4.0%

Healthcare

IJPH.L
6.3%
DXJG.L
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

IJPH.L
3.6%
DXJG.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

IJPH.L
3.0%
DXJG.L
7.5%

Real Estate

IJPH.L
2.3%
DXJG.L

-

Utilities

IJPH.L
1.1%
DXJG.L

-

Energy

IJPH.L
1.1%
DXJG.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJPH.L
IJPH.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJG.L
DXJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DXJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF JPY Acc (DXJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IJPH.LDXJG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

3.49

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.27

10.82

+8.45

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJPH.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the DXJG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJPH.L and DXJG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IJPH.LDXJG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.01

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.88

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.75

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.69

+0.04

Drawdowns

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJPH.L drawdown since its inception was -34.55%, which is greater than DXJG.L's maximum drawdown of -29.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPH.L and DXJG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJPH.LDXJG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-29.26%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.64%

-10.49%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.95%

-14.83%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-14.83%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-29.26%

-5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.86%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-5.34%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

3.39%

-0.68%

Volatility

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IJPH.L) is 3.51%, while WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF JPY Acc (DXJG.L) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that IJPH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJPH.LDXJG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

4.77%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.39%

14.81%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.98%

18.17%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.01%

16.13%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

16.11%

+3.13%

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJPH.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IJPH.L vs. DXJG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IJPH.L nor DXJG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IJPH.L and DXJG.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DXJG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DXJG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPH.L.

IJPH.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while DXJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for IJPH.L and 0.40% for DXJG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJPH.L and DXJG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer