IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L).
IJPD.L and ISAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IJPD.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Net TR Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2013. ISAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2001. Both IJPD.L and ISAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPD.L iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.39% | 29.04% | 24.14% | 35.59% | -3.08% | 12.22% | 10.80% | 18.74% | -14.26% | 20.81% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -1.59% | 22.36% | 17.81% | 22.57% | -18.16% | 18.85% | 15.66% | 25.77% | -9.73% | 24.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJPD.L achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than ISAC.L's -1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IJPD.L has outperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 15.24%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.
IJPD.L
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 23.50%
- 1Y
- 46.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.03%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
ISAC.L
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPD.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IJPD.L
ISAC.L
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJPD.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.41 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 1.97 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.00 | 2.44 | +2.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.30 | 9.75 | +7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJPD.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.41 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.63 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.70 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPD.L and ISAC.L is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IJPD.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.09%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPD.L and ISAC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJPD.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.09% | -33.82% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.78% | -11.58% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.80% | -26.07% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.09% | -33.82% | +2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -5.55% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -4.74% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.21% | +0.48% |
Volatility
IJPD.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 5.71%. This indicates that IJPD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IJPD.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 5.71% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.79% | 9.25% | +6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 15.59% | +6.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 15.47% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 15.88% | +3.22% |