IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L
IJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc) and IJPN.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares - IJPA.L tracks the MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI) while IJPN.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IJPA.L returned 9.30%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for IJPN.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IJPA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IJPN.L.
Performance
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IJPA.L is traded in USD, while IJPN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IJPN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IJPA.L achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly lower than IJPN.L's 16.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IJPA.L having a 9.30% annualized return and IJPN.L not far ahead at 9.68%.
IJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- 32.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
IJPN.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 33.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.68% | 27.28% | 6.62% | 19.34% | -16.16% | 0.16% | 14.98% | 18.46% | -14.15% | 25.83% |
IJPN.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 16.54% | 27.09% | 7.57% | 20.04% | -17.06% | 1.27% | 15.90% | 19.15% | -13.63% | 24.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IJPA.L and IJPN.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IJPA.L and IJPN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Technology
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Financial Services
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Consumer Cyclical
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Healthcare
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Communication Services
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Basic Materials
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Consumer Defensive
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Real Estate
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Utilities
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Energy
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L — Risk / Return Rank
IJPA.L
IJPN.L
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IJPA.L | IJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.53 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.86 | 8.50 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IJPA.L | IJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.65 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.25 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IJPA.L drawdown since its inception was -32.47%, smaller than the maximum IJPN.L drawdown of -51.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJPA.L and IJPN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IJPA.L | IJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.47% | -51.44% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -13.24% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -13.97% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.47% | -32.71% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.47% | -32.71% | +0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.30% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -13.40% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.96% | -0.30% |
Volatility
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IJPN.L) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IJPA.L | IJPN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 4.51% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 16.31% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 20.29% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 18.06% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 17.07% | -0.21% |
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IJPA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPN.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IJPA.L vs. IJPN.L - Dividend Comparison
IJPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IJPN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJPN.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.03% | 2.25% | 1.95% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.90% | 1.89% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IJPA.L and IJPN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IJPN.L.
IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI), while IJPN.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IJPA.L and 0.59% for IJPN.L.
Find the right allocation for IJPA.L and IJPN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer