IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while XNAQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IITU.L returned 23.93%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for XNAQ.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IITU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAQ.L.

Performance

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IITU.L is traded in GBp, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IITU.L having a 17.69% return and XNAQ.L slightly lower at 17.14%.

IITU.L

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 44.34%
• 3Y*: 28.72%
• 5Y*: 23.93%
• 10Y*: 26.66%

XNAQ.L

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 17.14%
• 6M: 17.33%
• 1Y: 37.57%
• 3Y*: 23.76%
• 5Y*: 17.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	17.69%	14.44%	40.85%	50.70%	-20.63%	34.16%
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	17.14%	11.72%	28.64%	47.82%	-25.44%	-8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and XNAQ.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021	0.94

The correlation between IITU.L and XNAQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IITU.L	XNAQ.L
Technology	99.6%	53.7%
Energy	0.1%	0.6%
Industrials	0.0%	3.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L

IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

XNAQ.L

XNAQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XNAQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XNAQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XNAQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IITU.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.45	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.21	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	3.40	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.67	9.85	-3.18

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the XNAQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and XNAQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than XNAQ.L's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and XNAQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IITU.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.09%	-34.26%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-10.99%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.03%	-24.55%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.03%	-27.52%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.27%	-2.90%	-4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.11%	-13.67%	+5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	3.80%	+2.83%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) at 5.78%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IITU.L	XNAQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	5.78%	+2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.42%	11.20%	+4.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.37%	15.32%	+5.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.20%	23.63%	+2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.68%	25.98%	-2.30%

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IITU.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IITU.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IITU.L and XNAQ.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, IITU.L and XNAQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, IITU.L or XNAQ.L?

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IITU.L or XNAQ.L?

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAQ.L.

What is the main difference between IITU.L and XNAQ.L?

IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XNAQ.L is Nasdaq-100. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.20% for XNAQ.L.