PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IITU.L is traded in GBp, while SXRV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXRV.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 23.25% return, which is significantly higher than SXRV.DE's 19.56% return. Over the past 10 years, IITU.L has outperformed SXRV.DE with an annualized return of 27.26%, while SXRV.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 22.42% annualized return.


IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%

SXRV.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
8.07%
YTD
19.56%
6M
17.58%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
22.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%
SXRV.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
19.56%12.54%27.73%48.17%-26.22%29.51%42.07%35.47%4.48%20.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and SXRV.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.91

The correlation between IITU.L and SXRV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRV.DE
SXRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IITU.LSXRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.73

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

10.86

-2.68

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the SXRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and SXRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IITU.LSXRV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.72

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

0.96

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

1.14

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.91

+0.31

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, smaller than the maximum SXRV.DE drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and SXRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IITU.LSXRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.03%

-33.79%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-11.06%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-25.09%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-27.70%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-27.70%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-0.76%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-6.45%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

3.81%

+2.70%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) at 4.53%. This indicates that IITU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IITU.LSXRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

4.53%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

10.70%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

15.17%

+4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.94%

19.41%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

19.59%

+1.72%

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRV.DE's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

IITU.L vs. SXRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IITU.L nor SXRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IITU.L and SXRV.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while SXRV.DE is Nasdaq-100. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.36% for SXRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IITU.L and SXRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer