PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IITU.L vs. NCLP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IITU.L achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly higher than NCLP.L's 3.72% return.


IITU.L

1D
2.47%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
17.69%
6M
18.41%
1Y
45.48%
3Y*
28.72%
5Y*
23.93%
10Y*
26.66%

NCLP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-14.90%
YTD
3.72%
6M
2.78%
1Y
47.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IITU.L and NCLP.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025

0.50

The correlation between IITU.L and NCLP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

NCLP.L
NCLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IITU.LNCLP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.19

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.67

2.55

+4.12

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IITU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the NCLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IITU.L and NCLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IITU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.09%, which is greater than NCLP.L's maximum drawdown of -39.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IITU.L and NCLP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IITU.LNCLP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-39.10%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-39.10%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-30.71%

+23.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-14.45%

+6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

18.27%

-11.64%

Volatility

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) is 8.62%, while WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NCLP.L) has a volatility of 12.92%. This indicates that IITU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IITU.LNCLP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

12.92%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

32.78%

-17.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.37%

63.64%

-43.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.20%

63.01%

-36.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.68%

63.01%

-39.33%

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IITU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NCLP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IITU.L vs. NCLP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IITU.L nor NCLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IITU.L and NCLP.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for NCLP.L.

IITU.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while NCLP.L is Uranium. IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while NCLP.L tracks WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IITU.L and 0.45% for NCLP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IITU.L and NCLP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer