IISU.L vs. SPLW.L
IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPLW.L (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IISU.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while SPLW.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IISU.L returned 18.78%/yr vs 4.58%/yr for SPLW.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IISU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLW.L.
Performance
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IISU.L is traded in GBp, while SPLW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPLW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IISU.L achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly higher than SPLW.L's 1.40% return.
IISU.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLW.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 1.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.64% | 11.24% | 19.29% | 11.45% | 6.06% | 6.16% |
SPLW.L Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc | 1.40% | -2.66% | 15.44% | -5.47% | 7.10% | 13.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IISU.L and SPLW.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IISU.L and SPLW.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IISU.L
SPLW.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
IISU.L
SPLW.L
Utilities
IISU.L
SPLW.L
Technology
IISU.L
SPLW.L
Consumer Cyclical
IISU.L
SPLW.L
Basic Materials
IISU.L
SPLW.L
Communication Services
IISU.L
-
SPLW.L
Consumer Defensive
IISU.L
-
SPLW.L
Energy
IISU.L
-
SPLW.L
Financial Services
IISU.L
-
SPLW.L
Healthcare
IISU.L
-
SPLW.L
Real Estate
IISU.L
-
SPLW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L — Risk / Return Rank
IISU.L
SPLW.L
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IISU.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.03 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 0.18 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 0.45 | +7.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IISU.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.12 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.43 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IISU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than SPLW.L's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISU.L and SPLW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IISU.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -14.28% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -7.56% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.12% | -10.82% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -7.04% | +5.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -5.84% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.03% | -0.08% |
Volatility
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF Acc (SPLW.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that IISU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IISU.L | SPLW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.98% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 8.70% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 11.19% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 12.99% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 12.99% | +5.66% |
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IISU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IISU.L vs. SPLW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IISU.L nor SPLW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IISU.L and SPLW.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLW.L.
IISU.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPLW.L is S&P 500. IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index, while SPLW.L tracks S&P 500 Low Vol NTR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IISU.L and 0.25% for SPLW.L.
Find the right allocation for IISU.L and SPLW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer