PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IISPX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IISPX achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.19% return.


IISPX

1D
0.38%
1M
5.91%
YTD
12.81%
6M
13.61%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.59%

FTLSX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.44%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IISPX
Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio
12.81%20.07%15.30%20.87%-19.26%17.64%16.42%24.65%-10.28%10.55%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.19%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IISPX and FTLSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.68

The correlation between IISPX and FTLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IISPX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IISPX
IISPX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IISPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IISPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IISPXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

2.67

-0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.71

3.98

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.55

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.32

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.09

14.65

+1.44

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IISPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IISPX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IISPXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.67

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.96

-0.31

Drawdowns

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IISPX drawdown since its inception was -34.45%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISPX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IISPXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.45%

-15.74%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-3.65%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.98%

-4.83%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-15.74%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-2.81%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

0.82%

+1.07%

Volatility

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 1.79%. This indicates that IISPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IISPXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

1.79%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

3.80%

+6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

4.54%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

5.43%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

4.78%

+11.59%

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IISPX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IISPX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

IISPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than FTLSX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.53%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%
IISPX
Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio
7.61%8.58%1.54%5.14%29.36%14.46%6.23%10.08%5.84%2.98%8.44%13.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


IISPX and FTLSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IISPX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FTLSX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IISPX dropped -34.45% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IISPX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer