PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IISPX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IISPX achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 12.26% return.


IISPX

1D
1.96%
1M
-0.57%
6M
6.34%
YTD
10.33%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.05%
ALL TIME*
10.14%

FQLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.35%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IISPX
Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio
10.33%20.07%15.30%20.87%-19.26%17.64%16.42%24.65%-10.28%9.99%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
12.26%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IISPX and FQLSX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.96

The correlation between IISPX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IISPX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IISPX
IISPX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IISPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IISPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IISPXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.42

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

10.10

-0.16

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IISPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IISPX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IISPX drawdown since its inception was -34.45%, which is greater than FQLSX's maximum drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IISPX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IISPXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.45%

-31.26%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-9.48%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.98%

-15.37%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-27.41%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-2.17%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-5.36%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.27%

-0.20%

Volatility

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio (IISPX) is 3.82%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that IISPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IISPXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.40%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

12.17%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

14.19%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

15.36%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

16.12%

+0.23%

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IISPX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IISPX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

IISPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, more than FQLSX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.66%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%0.00%0.00%
IISPX
Voya Solution 2055 Portfolio
7.78%8.58%1.54%5.14%29.36%14.46%6.23%10.08%5.84%2.98%8.44%13.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


IISPX and FQLSX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to IISPX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IISPX dropped -34.45% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IISPX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer