IISBX vs. IMCDX
IISBX (Voya Short Term Bond Fund) and IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) are both mutual funds - IISBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Voya, while IMCDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Voya. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IISBX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IMCDX.
Performance
IISBX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IISBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.03%
IMCDX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IISBX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IISBX Voya Short Term Bond Fund | 0.66% | 4.66% | 4.88% | 4.38% | -5.30% | 0.13% | 3.66% | 4.68% | 1.00% | 1.54% |
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 8.51% | -13.79% | 0.08% | 8.35% | 13.65% | -1.77% | 9.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between IISBX and IMCDX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IISBX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank
IISBX
IMCDX
IISBX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Short Term Bond Fund (IISBX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IISBX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IISBX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IISBX vs. IMCDX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IISBX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
IISBX vs. IMCDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IISBX | IMCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.25% | — | — |
IISBX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IISBX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IISBX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison
IISBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IISBX Voya Short Term Bond Fund | 3.80% | 3.46% | 4.75% | 2.96% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 2.25% | 2.40% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 1.90% | 1.88% |
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.08% | 4.21% | 3.80% | 6.14% | 4.64% | 4.99% | 5.30% | 4.79% | 5.22% | 5.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IISBX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IISBX and IMCDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer