IIRMX vs. SWMCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IIRMX (Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio) and SWMCX (Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, IIRMX returned 8.71%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for SWMCX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IIRMX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWMCX.

Performance

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio (IIRMX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIRMX achieves a 19.08% return, which is significantly higher than SWMCX's 14.87% return.

IIRMX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 15.62%
• YTD: 19.08%
• 1Y: 23.10%
• 3Y*: 15.96%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: 11.37%
• ALL TIME*: 10.43%

SWMCX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: 11.46%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 1Y: 20.65%
• 3Y*: 14.83%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IIRMX Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IIRMX Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio	19.08%	10.40%	14.78%	16.74%	-17.55%	21.79%	16.04%	29.16%	-9.30%	-0.00%
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund	14.87%	10.54%	15.28%	17.20%	-17.31%	22.55%	17.03%	30.46%	-9.16%	0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IIRMX and SWMCX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017	0.96

The correlation between IIRMX and SWMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IIRMX vs. SWMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IIRMX

IIRMX Risk / Return Rank: 58
IIRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
IIRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IIRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IIRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IIRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SWMCX

SWMCX Risk / Return Rank: 60
SWMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SWMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SWMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SWMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SWMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio (IIRMX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IIRMX	SWMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.33	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	1.95	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.24	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	2.24	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.96	8.66	+2.30

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIRMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the SWMCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIRMX and SWMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIRMX drawdown since its inception was -56.44%, which is greater than SWMCX's maximum drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRMX and SWMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IIRMX	SWMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.44%	-40.34%	-16.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-8.15%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.18%	-21.07%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.26%	-26.09%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.66%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-6.52%	-1.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	2.11%	+0.05%

Volatility

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio (IIRMX) and Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund (SWMCX) have volatilities of 2.49% and 2.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IIRMX	SWMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	2.39%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.37%	10.24%	+9.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.34%	13.71%	+8.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.34%	18.26%	+2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.34%	20.52%	-0.18%

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIRMX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SWMCX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

IIRMX vs. SWMCX - Dividend Comparison

IIRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.05%, more than SWMCX's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IIRMX Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Portfolio	37.05%	13.19%	10.43%	11.78%	10.34%	10.34%	14.22%	20.78%	15.64%	8.09%	14.11%	10.13%
SWMCX Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap Index Fund	1.85%	2.13%	2.60%	1.49%	1.59%	2.93%	1.45%	2.44%	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IIRMX and SWMCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IIRMX and SWMCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IIRMX or SWMCX?

IIRMX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to SWMCX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIRMX dropped -56.44% vs SWMCX's -40.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.