PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIRGX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Retirement Growth Portfolio (IIRGX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIRGX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than FSIRX's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IIRGX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.72% annualized return.


IIRGX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.75%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.39%
1Y
22.42%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
9.96%

FSIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
8.63%
6M
9.00%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
5.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IIRGX
Voya Retirement Growth Portfolio
9.29%16.01%14.97%18.48%-16.36%15.94%14.05%22.14%-9.13%17.15%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
8.63%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-3.99%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between IIRGX and FSIRX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between IIRGX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIRGX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIRGX
IIRGX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IIRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IIRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Retirement Growth Portfolio (IIRGX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIRGXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.69

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

7.98

-4.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

31.11

-15.59

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIRGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIRGX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIRGXFSIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

3.46

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.90

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.85

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.61

-0.22

Drawdowns

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIRGX drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, which is greater than FSIRX's maximum drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIRGX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIRGXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.97%

-33.39%

-23.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-2.05%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

-5.81%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-12.82%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.75%

-19.98%

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.83%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-4.17%

-6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

0.53%

+0.98%

Volatility

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Retirement Growth Portfolio (IIRGX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.29%. This indicates that IIRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIRGXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

1.29%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

3.76%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.12%

4.74%

+5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.10%

6.91%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.31%

6.74%

+6.57%

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIRGX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIRGX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

IIRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.02%, more than FSIRX's 4.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.19%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%
IIRGX
Voya Retirement Growth Portfolio
27.02%29.53%8.53%10.23%18.26%6.16%6.49%9.65%9.24%9.08%7.96%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIRGX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IIRGX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to FSIRX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIRGX dropped -56.97% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIRGX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer