IIPR vs. CWH
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH).
Performance
IIPR vs. CWH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IIPR vs. CWH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 10.03% | -18.40% | -28.55% | 8.78% | -59.02% | 47.49% | 151.33% | 72.52% | 43.88% | 82.30% |
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | -29.80% | -52.24% | -17.93% | 25.13% | -39.63% | 61.88% | 90.21% | 35.35% | -73.62% | 40.00% |
Fundamentals
IIPR:
$1.42B
CWH:
$428.40M
IIPR:
$4.14
CWH:
$5.51
IIPR:
12.12
CWH:
1.24
IIPR:
5.34
CWH:
0.07
IIPR:
0.79
CWH:
1.87
IIPR:
$265.96M
CWH:
$6.37B
IIPR:
$235.78M
CWH:
$1.88B
IIPR:
$205.79M
CWH:
$545.79M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIPR achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than CWH's -29.80% return.
IIPR
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- -3.14%
- 5Y*
- -16.29%
- 10Y*
- —
CWH
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -17.91%
- YTD
- -29.80%
- 6M
- -56.22%
- 1Y
- -56.61%
- 3Y*
- -29.01%
- 5Y*
- -25.08%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIPR vs. CWH — Risk / Return Rank
IIPR
CWH
IIPR vs. CWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | -0.79 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | -1.01 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.87 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | -0.83 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | -1.83 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | -0.79 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 | -0.47 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.13 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between IIPR and CWH is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IIPR vs. CWH - Dividend Comparison
IIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.15%, more than CWH's 5.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 15.15% | 16.05% | 11.28% | 7.16% | 7.01% | 2.18% | 2.44% | 3.73% | 1.87% | 1.70% | 0.00% |
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | 5.49% | 5.14% | 2.37% | 5.71% | 11.20% | 4.28% | 5.67% | 4.16% | 5.34% | 1.66% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
IIPR vs. CWH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIPR drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, smaller than the maximum CWH drawdown of -90.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIPR and CWH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -90.83% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.29% | -69.05% | +47.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.42% | -84.72% | +6.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.58% | -82.00% | +8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.35% | -40.51% | +4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.73% | 31.31% | -22.58% |
Volatility
IIPR vs. CWH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) is 9.37%, while Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) has a volatility of 22.51%. This indicates that IIPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.37% | 22.51% | -13.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.46% | 54.49% | -26.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.31% | 71.97% | -29.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.17% | 53.60% | -12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.45% | 62.16% | -13.71% |
Financials
IIPR vs. CWH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. and Camping World Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IIPR vs. CWH - Profitability Comparison
IIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.68M and revenue of 66.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.0%.
CWH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 338.24M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.
IIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.85M and revenue of 66.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.8%.
CWH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -50.05M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.3%.
IIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 30.71M and revenue of 66.66M, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.
CWH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 368.46M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.