IIPR vs. CWH
IIPR (Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.) and CWH (Camping World Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. IIPR operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while CWH operates in Recreational Vehicles (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, IIPR returned -13.55%/yr vs -26.12%/yr for CWH. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IIPR vs. CWH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IIPR achieves a 25.63% return, which is significantly higher than CWH's -26.82% return.
IIPR
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 8.26%
- YTD
- 25.63%
- 6M
- 20.32%
- 1Y
- 18.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- -13.55%
- 10Y*
- —
CWH
- 1D
- -4.30%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -26.82%
- 6M
- -36.16%
- 1Y
- -58.30%
- 3Y*
- -33.90%
- 5Y*
- -26.12%
- 10Y*
- —
IIPR vs. CWH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 25.63% | -18.40% | -28.55% | 8.78% | -59.02% | 47.49% | 151.33% | 72.52% | 43.88% | 82.30% |
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | -26.82% | -52.24% | -17.93% | 25.13% | -39.63% | 61.88% | 90.21% | 35.35% | -73.62% | 40.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIPR and CWH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2016 | 0.31 |
The correlation between IIPR and CWH shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IIPR:
$1.63B
CWH:
$451.96M
IIPR:
$4.14
CWH:
-$1.49
IIPR:
6.17
CWH:
0.07
IIPR:
0.91
CWH:
2.10
IIPR:
$263.23M
CWH:
$6.31B
IIPR:
$195.78M
CWH:
$1.85B
IIPR:
$210.04M
CWH:
$529.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IIPR vs. CWH — Risk / Return Rank
IIPR
CWH
IIPR vs. CWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) and Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.85 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | -0.85 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.17 | -1.46 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | -0.83 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | -0.48 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | -0.12 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
IIPR vs. CWH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIPR drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, smaller than the maximum CWH drawdown of -90.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIPR and CWH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -90.83% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.29% | -69.05% | +47.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.92% | -80.90% | +17.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.42% | -84.22% | +5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.83% | -81.24% | +11.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.00% | -41.25% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 39.93% | -31.21% |
Volatility
IIPR vs. CWH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) is 15.24%, while Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that IIPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IIPR | CWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.24% | 18.14% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.68% | 51.91% | -22.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.97% | 70.99% | -30.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.62% | 54.74% | -13.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.43% | 62.55% | -14.12% |
Dividends
IIPR vs. CWH - Dividend Comparison
IIPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.27%, more than CWH's 5.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | 5.27% | 5.14% | 2.37% | 5.71% | 11.20% | 4.28% | 5.67% | 4.16% | 5.34% | 1.66% | 0.25% |
IIPR Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. | 13.27% | 16.05% | 11.28% | 7.16% | 7.01% | 2.18% | 2.44% | 3.73% | 1.87% | 1.70% | 0.00% |
Financials
IIPR vs. CWH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. and Camping World Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IIPR vs. CWH - Profitability Comparison
IIPR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.42M and revenue of 69.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.0%.
CWH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 403.34M and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
IIPR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 32.91M and revenue of 69.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.7%.
CWH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.09M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
IIPR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 30.16M and revenue of 69.00M, resulting in a net margin of 43.7%.
CWH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camping World Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -16.40M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IIPR and CWH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWH has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to IIPR (15.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IIPR dropped -78.42% vs CWH's -90.83%.
IIPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IIPR and CWH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer