CWH vs. VOO
CWH (Camping World Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, CWH returned -24.87%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for VOO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CWH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWH achieves a -24.46% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return.
CWH
- 1D
- -5.28%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- -24.46%
- 6M
- -26.06%
- 1Y
- -57.24%
- 3Y*
- -34.22%
- 5Y*
- -24.87%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
CWH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | -24.46% | -52.24% | -17.93% | 25.13% | -39.63% | 61.88% | 90.21% | 35.35% | -73.62% | 40.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWH and VOO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CWH
VOO
CWH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.39 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 3.02 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 13.58 | -14.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWH drawdown since its inception was -90.83%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWH and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.83% | -33.99% | -56.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.05% | -8.90% | -60.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.90% | -18.69% | -62.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.22% | -24.52% | -59.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.63% | -1.74% | -78.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.47% | -3.68% | -37.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.06% | 1.98% | +40.08% |
Volatility
CWH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) has a higher volatility of 21.35% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that CWH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.35% | 4.60% | +16.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.81% | 9.73% | +45.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.64% | 12.39% | +60.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.32% | 16.90% | +38.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.70% | 18.05% | +44.65% |
Dividends
CWH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CWH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWH Camping World Holdings, Inc. | 3.40% | 5.14% | 2.37% | 5.71% | 11.20% | 4.28% | 5.67% | 4.16% | 5.34% | 1.66% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWH and VOO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWH has higher volatility (21.35%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWH dropped -90.83% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWH and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer