PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IIND.L vs. INQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) and India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IIND.L is traded in GBP, while INQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INQQ values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IIND.L achieves a -13.04% return, which is significantly higher than INQQ's -17.36% return.


IIND.L

1D
1.17%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
-13.04%
6M
-13.23%
1Y
-11.37%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*

INQQ

1D
1.28%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
-17.36%
6M
-19.80%
1Y
-22.30%
3Y*
1.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IIND.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-13.04%-2.93%11.04%12.49%1.27%
INQQ
India Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-17.36%-13.67%21.20%24.88%-29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IIND.L and INQQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2022

0.63

The correlation between IIND.L and INQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IIND.L
INQQ

Financial Services

28.3%
35.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
26.7%

Industrials

10.3%

-

Energy

9.5%
8.2%

Technology

8.3%
12.6%

Basic Materials

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
2.1%

Healthcare

6.2%
6.4%

Communication Services

4.7%
8.7%

Utilities

4.6%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Financial Services

IIND.L
28.3%
INQQ
35.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IIND.L
12.5%
INQQ
26.7%

Industrials

IIND.L
10.3%
INQQ

-

Energy

IIND.L
9.5%
INQQ
8.2%

Technology

IIND.L
8.3%
INQQ
12.6%

Basic Materials

IIND.L
8.0%
INQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

IIND.L
6.2%
INQQ
2.1%

Healthcare

IIND.L
6.2%
INQQ
6.4%

Communication Services

IIND.L
4.7%
INQQ
8.7%

Utilities

IIND.L
4.6%
INQQ

-

Real Estate

IIND.L
1.4%
INQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IIND.L vs. INQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IIND.L
IIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

INQQ
INQQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
INQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
INQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
INQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) and India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IIND.LINQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.79

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.77

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-1.55

+0.27

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IIND.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is higher than the INQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IIND.L and INQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IIND.LINQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

-1.31

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.33

+0.63

Drawdowns

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.72%, roughly equal to the maximum INQQ drawdown of -37.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIND.L and INQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IIND.LINQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.72%

-37.33%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.77%

-29.16%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-34.78%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.93%

-31.30%

+9.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-15.88%

+8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.85%

14.37%

-5.52%

Volatility

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to India Internet & Ecommerce ETF (INQQ) at 5.69%. This indicates that IIND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IIND.LINQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

5.69%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

14.39%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

17.11%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

19.32%

-3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.76%

19.32%

+1.44%

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IIND.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than INQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

IIND.L vs. INQQ - Dividend Comparison

IIND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.


PositionTTM202520242023
IIND.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INQQ
India Internet & Ecommerce ETF
2.71%2.23%1.18%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


IIND.L and INQQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IIND.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IIND.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for INQQ.

IIND.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while INQQ tracks INQQ The India Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and India. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IIND.L and 0.86% for INQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IIND.L and INQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer