PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
III.L vs. TMUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

III.L vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in 3I Group plc (III.L) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

III.L is traded in GBp, while TMUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TMUS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, III.L achieves a -29.97% return, which is significantly lower than TMUS's -5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, III.L has outperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 19.43%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively lower 17.61% annualized return.


III.L

1D
-1.04%
1M
3.39%
YTD
-29.97%
6M
-27.58%
1Y
-43.37%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
19.43%

TMUS

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.82%
YTD
-5.61%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
-14.61%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
17.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

III.L vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
III.L
3I Group plc
-29.97%-6.44%50.11%85.46%-3.46%28.99%9.36%47.12%-11.76%33.70%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
-5.61%-13.23%42.14%9.27%35.06%-13.18%66.91%18.59%6.10%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between III.L and TMUS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.16

The correlation between III.L and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

III.L:

£23.26B

TMUS:

$208.13B

EPS

III.L:

£10.41

TMUS:

$9.41

PE Ratio

III.L:

2.20

TMUS:

20.07

PEG Ratio

III.L:

0.27

TMUS:

0.30

PS Ratio

III.L:

10.70

TMUS:

2.34

PB Ratio

III.L:

0.75

TMUS:

3.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

III.L:

£2.12B

TMUS:

$90.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

III.L:

£5.57B

TMUS:

$34.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

III.L:

£9.82B

TMUS:

$28.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

III.L vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

III.L
III.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
III.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
III.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
III.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
III.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
III.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

III.L vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3I Group plc (III.L) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


III.LTMUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.92

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

-0.49

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.61

-0.82

-0.78

III.L vs. TMUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current III.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the TMUS Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of III.L and TMUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

III.L vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum III.L drawdown since its inception was -84.90%, roughly equal to the maximum TMUS drawdown of -82.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III.L and TMUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


III.LTMUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.90%

-82.61%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.78%

-30.20%

-22.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.78%

-37.22%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.78%

-37.22%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.78%

-37.22%

-15.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.17%

-32.98%

-15.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.09%

-24.62%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.99%

17.76%

+9.23%

Volatility

III.L vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison

3I Group plc (III.L) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 7.27%. This indicates that III.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


III.LTMUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.83%

7.27%

+5.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.16%

20.26%

+16.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.41%

26.16%

+17.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.79%

24.17%

+6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.35%

26.79%

+3.56%

Dividends

III.L vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison

III.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than TMUS's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
III.L
3I Group plc
3.46%2.42%1.82%2.32%3.76%2.78%3.02%3.42%4.78%2.90%3.41%2.37%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.09%1.80%1.28%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

III.L vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3I Group plc and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
236.00M
23.11B
(III.L) Total Revenue
(TMUS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. III.L values in GBP, TMUS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


III.L and TMUS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for III.L and TMUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer