III.L vs. BA.L
III.L (3I Group plc) and BA.L (BAE Systems plc) are both stocks. III.L operates in Investment Banking & Investment Services (Financial Services), while BA.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, III.L returned 19.43%/yr vs 18.20%/yr for BA.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
III.L vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, III.L achieves a -29.97% return, which is significantly lower than BA.L's 7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, III.L has outperformed BA.L with an annualized return of 19.43%, while BA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 18.20% annualized return.
III.L
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- -29.97%
- 6M
- -27.58%
- 1Y
- -43.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.89%
- 10Y*
- 19.43%
BA.L
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- -4.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.09%
- 5Y*
- 30.77%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
III.L vs. BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
III.L 3I Group plc | -29.97% | -6.44% | 50.11% | 85.46% | -3.46% | 28.99% | 9.36% | 47.12% | -11.76% | 33.70% |
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 7.37% | 52.12% | 5.88% | 33.31% | 60.92% | 17.57% | -9.28% | 28.43% | -16.75% | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between III.L and BA.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2006 | 0.35 |
The correlation between III.L and BA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (5 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
III.L:
£23.26B
BA.L:
£55.23B
III.L:
£10.41
BA.L:
£1.33
III.L:
2.20
BA.L:
13.73
III.L:
0.27
BA.L:
2.19
III.L:
10.70
BA.L:
1.01
III.L:
0.75
BA.L:
4.69
III.L:
£2.12B
BA.L:
£54.65B
III.L:
£5.57B
BA.L:
£4.75B
III.L:
£9.82B
BA.L:
£7.55B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
III.L vs. BA.L — Risk / Return Rank
III.L
BA.L
III.L vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3I Group plc (III.L) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| III.L | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.00 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.21 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | -0.44 | -1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
III.L vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum III.L drawdown since its inception was -84.90%, which is greater than BA.L's maximum drawdown of -43.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for III.L and BA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| III.L | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.90% | -43.67% | -41.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.78% | -21.30% | -31.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.78% | -21.30% | -31.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.78% | -21.30% | -31.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.78% | -37.80% | -14.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.17% | -21.05% | -27.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.09% | -12.75% | -10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.99% | 9.93% | +17.06% |
Volatility
III.L vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison
3I Group plc (III.L) has a higher volatility of 12.83% compared to BAE Systems plc (BA.L) at 9.75%. This indicates that III.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| III.L | BA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.83% | 9.75% | +3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.16% | 23.91% | +13.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.41% | 30.13% | +13.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.79% | 25.92% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 25.12% | +5.23% |
Dividends
III.L vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison
III.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than BA.L's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 1.99% | 1.99% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.99% | 4.40% | 4.75% | 4.00% | 4.79% | 3.75% | 3.57% | 4.14% |
III.L 3I Group plc | 3.46% | 2.42% | 1.82% | 2.32% | 3.76% | 2.78% | 3.02% | 3.42% | 4.78% | 2.90% | 3.41% | 2.37% |
Financials
III.L vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3I Group plc and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
III.L and BA.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for III.L and BA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer