IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L
IHYA.L (iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and GFGB.L (VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IHYA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while GFGB.L tracks the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHYA.L returned 3.99%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for GFGB.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHYA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GFGB.L.
Performance
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IHYA.L is traded in USD, while GFGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GFGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHYA.L achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than GFGB.L's 3.54% return.
IHYA.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
GFGB.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 8.87%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHYA.L iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.10% | 9.49% | 6.98% | 10.64% | -8.87% | 3.72% | 5.07% | 12.63% | -0.19% |
GFGB.L VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF | 3.55% | 10.14% | 6.07% | 9.77% | -12.76% | 2.37% | 16.54% | 14.18% | -3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHYA.L and GFGB.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between IHYA.L and GFGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
IHYA.L
GFGB.L
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHYA.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.26 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 7.35 | +4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHYA.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.27 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.38 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHYA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum GFGB.L drawdown of -24.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHYA.L and GFGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHYA.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -24.28% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -3.91% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.83% | -5.31% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.68% | -23.12% | +9.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -1.20% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -4.45% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 1.20% | -0.64% |
Volatility
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L) is 1.36%, while VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that IHYA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHYA.L | GFGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 3.71% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 5.96% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 6.94% | -3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.81% | 8.54% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 9.20% | -1.31% |
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHYA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GFGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHYA.L vs. GFGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IHYA.L nor GFGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IHYA.L and GFGB.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GFGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GFGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IHYA.L.
IHYA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GFGB.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IHYA.L and 0.40% for GFGB.L.
Find the right allocation for IHYA.L and GFGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer