PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L) and iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFGB.L achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than EHYG.L's -0.83% return.


GFGB.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.64%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

EHYG.L

1D
0.71%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
0.73%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EHYG.L's 0.27% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFGB.L
GFGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GFGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EHYG.L
EHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L) and iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFGB.LEHYG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

1.53

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.82

2.27

-1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.31

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.12

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.89

9.74

-6.84

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the EHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFGB.L and EHYG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFGB.LEHYG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

1.53

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

2.38

-1.73

Correlation

The correlation between GFGB.L and EHYG.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFGB.L nor EHYG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFGB.L drawdown since its inception was -15.95%, which is greater than EHYG.L's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFGB.L and EHYG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFGB.LEHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.95%

-3.19%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-2.85%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.84%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-0.31%

-2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.62%

+0.76%

Volatility

GFGB.L vs. EHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (GFGB.L) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to iShares € High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (EHYG.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that GFGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFGB.LEHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

1.91%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

2.47%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

3.89%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.66%

3.48%

+4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.76%

3.48%

+5.28%