PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHI vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHI vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -19.71% return, which is significantly lower than MOAT's -1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 8.79%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.


IHI

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.73%
YTD
-19.71%
6M
-19.80%
1Y
-19.39%
3Y*
-1.88%
5Y*
-2.08%
10Y*
8.79%

MOAT

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.23%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHI vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHI
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF
-19.71%6.88%8.62%3.24%-19.80%21.03%24.17%32.75%15.45%30.81%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-1.74%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IHI and MOAT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.70

The correlation between IHI and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IHI vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IHI
MOAT

Healthcare

100.0%
16.0%

Industrials

0.2%
13.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

17.5%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

6.7%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

32.8%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IHI
100.0%
MOAT
16.0%

Industrials

IHI
0.2%
MOAT
13.5%

Basic Materials

IHI

-

MOAT

-

Communication Services

IHI

-

MOAT
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IHI

-

MOAT
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

IHI

-

MOAT
17.5%

Energy

IHI

-

MOAT

-

Financial Services

IHI

-

MOAT
6.7%

Real Estate

IHI

-

MOAT
0.8%

Technology

IHI

-

MOAT
32.8%

Utilities

IHI

-

MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHI vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHI
IHI Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHI Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHI Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHI vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHIMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.17

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

1.06

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.85

3.29

-5.14

IHI vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHI Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHI and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHIMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

0.95

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.43

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.72

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.77

-0.30

Drawdowns

IHI vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHIMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-33.31%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.11%

-12.43%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-21.44%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.12%

-23.96%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

-33.31%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.19%

-5.49%

-18.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-3.83%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

4.01%

+6.47%

Volatility

IHI vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 4.01%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHIMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.01%

4.01%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

9.90%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

13.90%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

18.19%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.80%

18.69%

+1.11%

IHI vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHI has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHI vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than MOAT's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHI
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF
0.45%0.34%0.46%0.53%0.45%0.25%0.25%0.33%0.26%0.37%0.55%1.28%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.38%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHI and MOAT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHI has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to MOAT (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.45% vs 8.79% for IHI. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHI is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.45% for IHI.

IHI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IHI and 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHI and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer