IHI vs. IXC
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHI returned 8.79%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for IXC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHI charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXC.
Performance
IHI vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -19.71% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 30.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 8.79%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.
IHI
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- -19.71%
- 6M
- -19.80%
- 1Y
- -19.39%
- 3Y*
- -1.88%
- 5Y*
- -2.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
IXC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 30.67%
- 6M
- 30.15%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
IHI vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -19.71% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 30.67% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and IXC is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.43 |
The correlation between IHI and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IHI vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
IXC
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IHI
IXC
-
Industrials
IHI
IXC
-
Basic Materials
IHI
-
IXC
-
Communication Services
IHI
-
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
IXC
-
Energy
IHI
-
IXC
Financial Services
IHI
-
IXC
-
Real Estate
IHI
-
IXC
-
Technology
IHI
-
IXC
-
Utilities
IHI
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
IXC
IHI vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHI | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.41 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 4.82 | -5.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.85 | 14.26 | -16.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHI | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | 2.48 | -3.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 0.83 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.32 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
IHI vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -67.88% | +18.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -9.66% | -16.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -19.06% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -24.93% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | -64.16% | +30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.19% | -5.96% | -18.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -17.47% | +9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.48% | 3.26% | +7.22% |
Volatility
IHI vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.55%. This indicates that IHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 6.55% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 15.51% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 18.79% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 23.52% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 26.85% | -7.05% |
IHI vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IXC's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.45% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.82% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and IXC have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to IXC (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.03% vs 8.79% for IHI. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.45% for IHI.
IHI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IHI and 0.46% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer