IHI vs. GNOM
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and GNOM (Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IHI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index while GNOM tracks the Solactive Genomics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHI returned -1.87%/yr vs -10.36%/yr for GNOM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHI charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GNOM.
Performance
IHI vs. GNOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -19.36% return, which is significantly lower than GNOM's 6.84% return.
IHI
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- -19.36%
- 6M
- -20.97%
- 1Y
- -18.97%
- 3Y*
- -1.89%
- 5Y*
- -1.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
GNOM
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 51.76%
- 3Y*
- -1.47%
- 5Y*
- -10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
IHI vs. GNOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -19.36% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 15.23% |
GNOM Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | 6.84% | 18.65% | -15.99% | -8.63% | -36.27% | -15.93% | 51.52% | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and GNOM is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.58 |
The correlation between IHI and GNOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IHI vs. GNOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
GNOM
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IHI
GNOM
Industrials
IHI
GNOM
-
Basic Materials
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Communication Services
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Energy
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Financial Services
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Real Estate
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Technology
IHI
-
GNOM
Utilities
IHI
-
GNOM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. GNOM — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
GNOM
IHI vs. GNOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHI | GNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.31 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.86 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.83 | 8.23 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHI | GNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.12 | 1.93 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | -0.31 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | -0.09 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
IHI vs. GNOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum GNOM drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and GNOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | GNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -75.00% | +25.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -18.17% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -46.47% | +19.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -72.29% | +39.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.85% | -55.85% | +32.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -40.57% | +32.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | 6.31% | +4.07% |
Volatility
IHI vs. GNOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) is 7.02%, while Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF (GNOM) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that IHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | GNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 9.57% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 19.99% | -6.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.97% | 27.01% | -10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 33.65% | -14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 34.21% | -14.41% |
IHI vs. GNOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GNOM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. GNOM - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than GNOM's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNOM Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | 1.29% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and GNOM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GNOM has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to IHI (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs GNOM's -75.00%.
On 5-year performance, IHI leads with -1.87% vs -10.36% for GNOM. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IHI has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IHI has performed better with a -1.87% return vs -10.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GNOM.
GNOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.44% for IHI.
IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while GNOM tracks Solactive Genomics Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IHI and 0.50% for GNOM.
GNOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and GNOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer