IHI vs. EWY
IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while EWY is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHI returned 8.42%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for EWY. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHI charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
IHI vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHI achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 67.52% return. Over the past 10 years, IHI has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 8.42%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.
IHI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 1Y
- -15.42%
- 3Y*
- -3.77%
- 5Y*
- -3.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.83%
EWY
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -25.70%
- 6M
- 45.13%
- YTD
- 67.52%
- 1Y
- 130.03%
- 3Y*
- 38.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.80%
IHI vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -18.43% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 67.52% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHI and EWY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHI and EWY has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IHI vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHI
EWY
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IHI
EWY
Technology
IHI
EWY
Industrials
IHI
EWY
Basic Materials
IHI
-
EWY
Communication Services
IHI
-
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
IHI
-
EWY
Consumer Defensive
IHI
-
EWY
Energy
IHI
-
EWY
Financial Services
IHI
-
EWY
Real Estate
IHI
-
EWY
-
Utilities
IHI
-
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHI vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
IHI
EWY
IHI vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.40 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 5.06 | -5.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 16.04 | -17.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHI vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHI drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHI and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.65% | -74.14% | +24.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.11% | -25.85% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.64% | -27.36% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -47.15% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.25% | -49.73% | +16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.98% | -25.70% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -20.09% | +11.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 8.14% | +4.56% |
Volatility
IHI vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) is 9.63%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 22.94%. This indicates that IHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | 22.94% | -13.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 48.48% | -32.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 51.71% | -32.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 31.91% | -12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 28.90% | -8.92% |
IHI vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHI vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
IHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than EWY's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.25% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.48% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHI and EWY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (22.94%) compared to IHI (9.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHI dropped -49.65% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 13.73% vs 8.42% for IHI. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IHI has been the lower-risk option at 9.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.48% for IHI.
IHI is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EWY is South Korea Equities. IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IHI and 0.59% for EWY.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHI and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer