PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHE vs. RSPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHE vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHE achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly higher than RSPH's -2.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IHE having a 7.81% annualized return and RSPH not far ahead at 7.94%.


IHE

1D
1.16%
1M
1.80%
YTD
6.47%
6M
8.51%
1Y
40.15%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
7.81%

RSPH

1D
0.81%
1M
2.49%
YTD
-2.71%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
8.70%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHE vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
6.47%31.69%8.13%1.06%-4.87%13.07%13.66%15.47%-7.76%10.64%
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
-2.71%9.52%-0.94%3.95%-9.40%23.19%18.83%25.48%-0.66%23.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IHE and RSPH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006

0.81

The correlation between IHE and RSPH shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IHE vs. RSPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IHE
RSPH

Healthcare

100.0%
98.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IHE
100.0%
RSPH
98.5%

Basic Materials

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Communication Services

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Consumer Cyclical

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Consumer Defensive

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Energy

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Financial Services

IHE

-

RSPH
0.1%

Industrials

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Real Estate

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Technology

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Utilities

IHE

-

RSPH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHE vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHE
IHE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPH
RSPH Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RSPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPH Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHE vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHERSPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.11

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

0.80

+3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

2.01

+12.34

IHE vs. RSPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the RSPH Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHE and RSPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHERSPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

0.57

+1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.16

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.45

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.58

-0.07

Drawdowns

IHE vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHE drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, smaller than the maximum RSPH drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHE and RSPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHERSPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.20%

-40.49%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-10.87%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-17.13%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.03%

-21.95%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.59%

-30.44%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-6.83%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-6.14%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

4.33%

-1.52%

Volatility

IHE vs. RSPH - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) at 3.87%. This indicates that IHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHERSPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

3.87%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

10.36%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

15.46%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

16.26%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.72%

+0.33%

IHE vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHE has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHE vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison

IHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than RSPH's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.65%1.76%1.73%1.39%2.01%1.49%1.19%1.40%1.25%1.36%0.92%1.93%
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
0.73%0.70%0.71%0.66%0.64%0.50%0.51%0.54%0.53%0.47%0.48%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHE and RSPH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHE has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to RSPH (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHE dropped -38.20% vs RSPH's -40.49%.

On 10-year performance, RSPH leads with 7.94% vs 7.81% for IHE. On fees, RSPH is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPH has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPH has performed better with a 7.94% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPH is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IHE.

IHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.73% for RSPH.

IHE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index, while RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IHE and 0.40% for RSPH.

IHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHE and RSPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer