PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHE achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IHE has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 7.81%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


IHE

1D
1.16%
1M
1.80%
YTD
6.47%
6M
8.51%
1Y
40.15%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
7.81%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
6.47%31.69%8.13%1.06%-4.87%13.07%13.66%15.47%-7.76%10.64%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IHE and ACWI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between IHE and ACWI has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IHE vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IHE
ACWI

Healthcare

100.0%
8.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

16.1%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Healthcare

IHE
100.0%
ACWI
8.1%

Basic Materials

IHE

-

ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

IHE

-

ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IHE

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IHE

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

IHE

-

ACWI
4.2%

Financial Services

IHE

-

ACWI
16.1%

Industrials

IHE

-

ACWI
10.9%

Real Estate

IHE

-

ACWI
1.8%

Technology

IHE

-

ACWI
29.4%

Utilities

IHE

-

ACWI
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHE
IHE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IHEACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

3.01

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

13.53

+0.82

IHE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHE and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IHEACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.29

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.71

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.75

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.43

+0.08

Drawdowns

IHE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHE drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHE and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.20%

-56.00%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-9.73%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-16.55%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.03%

-26.42%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.59%

-33.53%

+3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.83%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-8.61%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.16%

+0.65%

Volatility

IHE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that IHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

3.93%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

10.29%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

12.78%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

16.05%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.11%

+0.94%

IHE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IHE has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IHE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.65%1.76%1.73%1.39%2.01%1.49%1.19%1.40%1.25%1.36%0.92%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IHE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHE has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHE dropped -38.20% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 7.81% for IHE. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IHE.

IHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

IHE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IHE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IHE and 0.32% for ACWI.

IHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHE and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer