IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L
IHCU.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IHCU.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while IWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IHCU.L returned 9.36%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for IWDA.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IHCU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.L.
Performance
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IHCU.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHCU.L achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than IWDA.L's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IHCU.L has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 9.36%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.
IHCU.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
IWDA.L
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.69%
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHCU.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.10% | 6.77% | 3.96% | -3.89% | 8.99% | 29.15% | 8.09% | 16.89% | 10.43% | 11.31% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.72% | 12.41% | 21.19% | 18.05% | -8.38% | 23.34% | 12.65% | 22.29% | -3.62% | 12.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHCU.L and IWDA.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IHCU.L and IWDA.L has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IHCU.L
IWDA.L
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHCU.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IHCU.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.24 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 11.85 | -7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHCU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHCU.L and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHCU.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -26.18% | -12.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.54% | -6.37% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.98% | -18.91% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.98% | -18.91% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.98% | -26.18% | +2.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -1.46% | -2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -3.50% | -6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 1.74% | +2.89% |
Volatility
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHCU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 2.90%. This indicates that IHCU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHCU.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 2.90% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 9.48% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 11.98% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 14.57% | +5.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 15.42% | +3.13% |
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHCU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IHCU.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IHCU.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IHCU.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IHCU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IHCU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.L.
IHCU.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. IHCU.L tracks iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IHCU.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for IHCU.L and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer