PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHCU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IHCU.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHCU.L achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 16.58% return. Over the past 10 years, IHCU.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 9.36%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.18% annualized return.


IHCU.L

1D
0.45%
1M
4.09%
6M
1.95%
YTD
3.10%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.36%

IUIT.L

1D
-1.81%
1M
-3.80%
6M
18.89%
YTD
16.58%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
27.83%
5Y*
21.45%
10Y*
25.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHCU.L
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.10%6.77%3.96%-3.89%8.99%29.15%8.09%16.89%10.43%11.31%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
16.58%14.17%40.92%51.48%-20.73%35.36%38.94%43.17%4.43%26.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IHCU.L and IUIT.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.45

The correlation between IHCU.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHCU.L
IHCU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IHCU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHCU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHCU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IHCU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHCU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHCU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHCU.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.78

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.47

4.24

+0.23

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHCU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHCU.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHCU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHCU.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHCU.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-28.01%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-16.96%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.98%

-28.01%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.98%

-28.01%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.98%

-28.01%

+4.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-8.27%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-5.18%

-4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

7.11%

-2.48%

Volatility

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHCU.L) is 5.45%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that IHCU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHCU.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

7.26%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

17.36%

-6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

22.17%

-6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

23.19%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

22.24%

-3.69%

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IHCU.L and IUIT.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IHCU.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IHCU.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IHCU.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IHCU.L and IUIT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

IHCU.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. IHCU.L tracks iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHCU.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer