IHAK vs. SLV
IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IHAK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IHAK returned 7.79%/yr vs 21.04%/yr for SLV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IHAK charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IHAK vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IHAK achieves a 22.96% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return.
IHAK
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 19.29%
- YTD
- 22.96%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 113.72%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
IHAK vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 22.96% | -1.29% | 7.60% | 37.77% | -25.81% | 11.13% | 51.22% | 6.66% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 3.97% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between IHAK and SLV is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019 | 0.18 |
The correlation between IHAK and SLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IHAK vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IHAK
SLV
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IHAK
SLV
-
Industrials
IHAK
SLV
-
Communication Services
IHAK
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IHAK
-
SLV
Consumer Cyclical
IHAK
-
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
IHAK
-
SLV
-
Energy
IHAK
-
SLV
-
Financial Services
IHAK
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
IHAK
-
SLV
-
Real Estate
IHAK
-
SLV
-
Utilities
IHAK
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IHAK vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IHAK
SLV
IHAK vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IHAK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.69 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 5.76 | -4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IHAK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.94 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.25 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
IHAK vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IHAK drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHAK and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IHAK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.42% | -76.28% | +41.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.48% | -42.45% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.48% | -42.45% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.42% | -42.45% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -36.57% | +33.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -44.67% | +33.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.98% | 19.81% | -9.83% |
Volatility
IHAK vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF (IHAK) is 9.43%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that IHAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IHAK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.43% | 16.34% | -6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.92% | 58.31% | -38.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 58.90% | -34.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 36.15% | -12.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 31.83% | -7.42% |
IHAK vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IHAK has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IHAK vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IHAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHAK iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.13% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.40% | 0.50% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IHAK and SLV have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to IHAK (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHAK dropped -34.42% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 21.04% vs 7.79% for IHAK. On fees, IHAK is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IHAK has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 21.04% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHAK is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IHAK has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IHAK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SLV is Silver. IHAK tracks NYSE FactSet Global Cyber Security Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IHAK and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IHAK and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer