IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L
IH2O.L (iShares Global Water UCITS ETF) and SSLV.L (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IH2O.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR, while SSLV.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IH2O.L returned 10.41%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for SSLV.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IH2O.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SSLV.L.
Performance
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IH2O.L is traded in GBp, while SSLV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SSLV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IH2O.L achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than SSLV.L's 3.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IH2O.L has underperformed SSLV.L with an annualized return of 10.41%, while SSLV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.
IH2O.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 28.22%
- 1Y
- 115.96%
- 3Y*
- 42.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.62%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | -1.56% | 10.23% | 6.31% | 7.67% | -11.13% | 33.06% | 11.63% | 29.99% | -4.91% | 16.22% |
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 3.29% | 130.03% | 23.22% | -5.88% | 15.90% | -12.13% | 41.64% | 11.90% | -3.30% | -5.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IH2O.L and SSLV.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.12 |
The correlation between IH2O.L and SSLV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L — Risk / Return Rank
IH2O.L
SSLV.L
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IH2O.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.98 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 6.51 | -5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IH2O.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 2.07 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.67 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.56 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.16 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -35.40%, smaller than the maximum SSLV.L drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IH2O.L and SSLV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IH2O.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.40% | -67.74% | +32.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -38.71% | +28.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -38.71% | +24.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.14% | -38.71% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.16% | -38.71% | +11.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -33.61% | +24.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -43.04% | +37.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 17.73% | -13.87% |
Volatility
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IH2O.L) is 3.95%, while Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that IH2O.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IH2O.L | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 16.84% | -12.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 52.73% | -42.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 55.60% | -43.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 33.88% | -19.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 30.06% | -15.14% |
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IH2O.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLV.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IH2O.L vs. SSLV.L - Dividend Comparison
IH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while SSLV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IH2O.L iShares Global Water UCITS ETF | 1.91% | 1.78% | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.32% | 2.25% | 1.29% | 1.84% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 2.17% | 2.45% |
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IH2O.L and SSLV.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLV.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLV.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IH2O.L.
IH2O.L is categorized as Water Equities, while SSLV.L is Silver. IH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while SSLV.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IH2O.L and 0.19% for SSLV.L.
Find the right allocation for IH2O.L and SSLV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer