PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGUS.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGUS.L achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IGUS.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 13.48%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.


IGUS.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.70%
YTD
9.82%
6M
10.53%
1Y
27.11%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
13.48%

IUIT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.49%
1Y
56.60%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGUS.L
iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF
9.82%17.39%24.64%24.49%-20.60%28.57%14.63%27.27%-7.47%19.85%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.54%14.17%40.92%51.48%-20.73%35.36%38.94%43.23%4.43%25.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IGUS.L and IUIT.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015

0.72

The correlation between IGUS.L and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGUS.L
IUIT.L

Technology

35.6%
99.6%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
0.1%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

IGUS.L
35.6%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Financial Services

IGUS.L
11.8%
IUIT.L

-

Communication Services

IGUS.L
11.2%
IUIT.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IGUS.L
10.2%
IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

IGUS.L
8.5%
IUIT.L

-

Industrials

IGUS.L
8.3%
IUIT.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

IGUS.L
4.9%
IUIT.L

-

Energy

IGUS.L
3.5%
IUIT.L
0.1%

Utilities

IGUS.L
2.3%
IUIT.L

-

Real Estate

IGUS.L
1.9%
IUIT.L

-

Basic Materials

IGUS.L
1.8%
IUIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGUS.L
IGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGUS.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.32

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.92

8.42

+5.50

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGUS.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGUS.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.78

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.14

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

1.26

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.24

-0.42

Drawdowns

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGUS.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGUS.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.66%

-28.01%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-16.96%

+8.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-28.01%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-28.01%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.66%

-28.01%

-8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.78%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-5.29%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

6.70%

-4.76%

Volatility

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (IGUS.L) is 3.21%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that IGUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGUS.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

7.16%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

15.20%

-6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

20.23%

-8.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

22.82%

-6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

22.51%

-5.93%

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGUS.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGUS.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IGUS.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGUS.L.

IGUS.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. IGUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IGUS.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGUS.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer