PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGTR vs. VMOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGTR vs. VMOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGTR achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than VMOT's 17.28% return.


IGTR

1D
-0.47%
1M
13.18%
YTD
21.49%
6M
24.80%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10Y*

VMOT

1D
-0.37%
1M
3.80%
YTD
17.28%
6M
20.07%
1Y
34.59%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGTR vs. VMOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGTR
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF
21.49%15.25%4.02%-0.31%-2.08%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
17.28%18.54%12.07%-0.74%-2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IGTR and VMOT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022

0.68

The correlation between IGTR and VMOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGTR vs. VMOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGTR
VMOT

Financial Services

25.7%
8.1%

Industrials

20.7%
19.9%

Technology

13.2%
11.4%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
18.8%

Basic Materials

8.1%
5.1%

Energy

4.8%
8.6%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
8.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
7.3%

Utilities

2.0%
3.3%

Financial Services

IGTR
25.7%
VMOT
8.1%

Industrials

IGTR
20.7%
VMOT
19.9%

Technology

IGTR
13.2%
VMOT
11.4%

Healthcare

IGTR
8.2%
VMOT
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IGTR
8.1%
VMOT
18.8%

Basic Materials

IGTR
8.1%
VMOT
5.1%

Energy

IGTR
4.8%
VMOT
8.6%

Real Estate

IGTR
3.5%
VMOT
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

IGTR
3.3%
VMOT
8.5%

Communication Services

IGTR
2.4%
VMOT
7.3%

Utilities

IGTR
2.0%
VMOT
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGTR vs. VMOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGTR
IGTR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IGTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IGTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGTR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGTR vs. VMOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGTRVMOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

3.20

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

13.42

+0.55

IGTR vs. VMOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the VMOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGTR and VMOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGTRVMOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.28

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.35

+0.28

Drawdowns

IGTR vs. VMOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGTR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum VMOT drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGTR and VMOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGTRVMOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.06%

-34.71%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-10.85%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.06%

-20.23%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.55%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-13.32%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.58%

+0.53%

Volatility

IGTR vs. VMOT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) at 5.00%. This indicates that IGTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGTRVMOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

5.00%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.97%

12.87%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

15.26%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

15.68%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

14.90%

+1.92%

IGTR vs. VMOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGTR has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than VMOT's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGTR vs. VMOT - Dividend Comparison

IGTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VMOT's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGTR
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF
0.66%0.80%2.40%0.87%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.75%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGTR and VMOT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGTR has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to VMOT (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGTR dropped -20.06% vs VMOT's -34.71%.

On 3-year performance, VMOT leads with 19.57% vs 17.59% for IGTR. On fees, IGTR is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, VMOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VMOT has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 17.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGTR is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.66% for IGTR.

IGTR is categorized as Global Equities, while VMOT is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IGTR and 1.75% for VMOT.

VMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGTR and VMOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer