IGTR vs. BAPR
IGTR (Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - IGTR is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. IGTR is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGTR returned 17.59%/yr vs 15.31%/yr for BAPR. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGTR charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BAPR.
Performance
IGTR vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGTR achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than BAPR's 10.81% return.
IGTR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 24.80%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
IGTR vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF | 21.49% | 15.25% | 4.02% | -0.31% | -2.08% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 10.81% | 8.28% | 15.95% | 23.16% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGTR and BAPR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IGTR and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGTR vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGTR
BAPR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
IGTR
BAPR
Industrials
IGTR
BAPR
Technology
IGTR
BAPR
Healthcare
IGTR
BAPR
Consumer Cyclical
IGTR
BAPR
Basic Materials
IGTR
BAPR
Energy
IGTR
BAPR
Real Estate
IGTR
BAPR
Consumer Defensive
IGTR
BAPR
Communication Services
IGTR
BAPR
Utilities
IGTR
BAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGTR vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
IGTR
BAPR
IGTR vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGTR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.87 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 10.46 | -6.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 57.55 | -43.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGTR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 3.59 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.84 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
IGTR vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGTR drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGTR and BAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGTR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -23.91% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -1.93% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | -15.58% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.23% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -2.59% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 0.35% | +2.76% |
Volatility
IGTR vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF (IGTR) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that IGTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGTR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 1.06% | +6.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.97% | 4.53% | +9.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 5.64% | +13.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 11.49% | +5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 13.12% | +3.70% |
IGTR vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGTR has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGTR vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
IGTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGTR Innovator Gradient Tactical Rotation Strategy ETF | 0.66% | 0.80% | 2.40% | 0.87% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGTR and BAPR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGTR has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to BAPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGTR dropped -20.06% vs BAPR's -23.91%.
On 3-year performance, IGTR leads with 17.59% vs 15.31% for BAPR. On fees, BAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IGTR has performed better with a 17.59% return vs 15.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IGTR.
IGTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.
IGTR is categorized as Global Equities, while BAPR is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IGTR and 0.79% for BAPR.
BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGTR and BAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer