PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

IGSU.L (iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IGSU.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while IWVL.L tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGSU.L returned 11.98%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for IWVL.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGSU.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWVL.L.

Performance

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGSU.L achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 31.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGSU.L having a 11.98% annualized return and IWVL.L not far ahead at 12.51%.

IGSU.L

1D
-1.75%
1M
1.19%
YTD
6.97%
6M
9.48%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
11.98%

IWVL.L

1D
-2.25%
1M
7.44%
YTD
31.26%
6M
34.99%
1Y
62.28%
3Y*
29.03%
5Y*
15.75%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGSU.L
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		6.97%22.56%10.93%26.36%-17.16%21.45%13.60%25.67%-8.24%22.16%
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		31.26%40.42%5.13%19.53%-9.79%20.11%-3.67%18.13%-14.03%22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IGSU.L and IWVL.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.86

The correlation between IGSU.L and IWVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IGSU.L
IWVL.L

Technology

37.1%
33.9%

Financial Services

20.2%
14.8%

Industrials

12.5%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.8%

Basic Materials

5.3%
3.0%

Energy

3.6%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
7.9%

Utilities

3.0%
2.5%

Communication Services

2.6%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
4.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.8%

Technology

IGSU.L
37.1%
IWVL.L
33.9%

Financial Services

IGSU.L
20.2%
IWVL.L
14.8%

Industrials

IGSU.L
12.5%
IWVL.L
11.3%

Healthcare

IGSU.L
8.9%
IWVL.L
8.8%

Basic Materials

IGSU.L
5.3%
IWVL.L
3.0%

Energy

IGSU.L
3.6%
IWVL.L
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IGSU.L
3.0%
IWVL.L
7.9%

Utilities

IGSU.L
3.0%
IWVL.L
2.5%

Communication Services

IGSU.L
2.6%
IWVL.L
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

IGSU.L
1.7%
IWVL.L
4.5%

Real Estate

IGSU.L
1.6%
IWVL.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with IGSU.L:
IGSU.L vs. IGSG.ASIGSU.L vs. USML.LIGSU.L vs. GLRE.LIGSU.L vs. VUSA.LIGSU.L vs. GGRG.LIGSU.L vs. BOTZIGSU.L vs. VUAG.L
Often compared with IWVL.L:
IWVL.L vs. VWRA.LIWVL.L vs. IWDA.ASIWVL.L vs. IWQU.LIWVL.L vs. DFIVIWVL.L vs. VOOIWVL.L vs. URTHIWVL.L vs. VT

Return for Risk

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IGSU.L
IGSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IGSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
IWVL.L
IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IGSU.LIWVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.58
3.93

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.34
5.41

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.70

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

7.09

-4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

26.73

-18.40

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGSU.L and IWVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IGSU.LIWVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

3.93

-2.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.98

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.73

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.61

-0.05

Drawdowns

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGSU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum IWVL.L drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSU.L and IWVL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IGSU.LIWVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.33%

-39.30%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-8.74%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-14.46%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.15%

-26.55%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.33%

-39.30%

+5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-3.14%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-7.48%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.32%

+0.15%

Volatility

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IGSU.L) is 3.90%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that IGSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IGSU.LIWVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

6.93%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

13.19%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

15.76%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

16.06%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

17.02%

-1.15%

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGSU.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGSU.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGSU.L nor IWVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

IGSU.L and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGSU.L.

IGSU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGSU.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGSU.L and IWVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer