PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGSG.AS vs. SSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGSG.AS is traded in EUR, while SSO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SSO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGSG.AS achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IGSG.AS has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 12.01%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.89% annualized return.


IGSG.AS

1D
0.07%
1M
5.16%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.53%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
12.01%

SSO

1D
0.56%
1M
9.56%
YTD
21.57%
6M
19.75%
1Y
51.32%
3Y*
34.42%
5Y*
20.90%
10Y*
23.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGSG.AS
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF
10.10%8.59%18.22%22.31%-12.70%31.66%4.00%28.06%-4.00%7.54%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
21.57%11.21%52.95%42.26%-35.20%72.58%11.52%67.14%-10.59%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IGSG.AS and SSO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2011

0.57

The correlation between IGSG.AS and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGSG.AS vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGSG.AS
IGSG.AS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IGSG.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSG.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSG.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSG.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSG.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SSO
SSO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGSG.ASSSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.09

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

12.66

-1.40

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGSG.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGSG.AS and SSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGSG.ASSSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.23

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.64

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.67

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.43

-0.31

Drawdowns

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGSG.AS drawdown since its inception was -44.01%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSG.AS and SSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGSG.ASSSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.01%

-82.84%

+38.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-16.71%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.27%

-38.36%

+19.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.27%

-38.89%

+19.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

-59.03%

+26.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.58%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.77%

-20.04%

+8.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

4.06%

-2.19%

Volatility

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) is 3.31%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that IGSG.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGSG.ASSSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.82%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

16.91%

-8.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.06%

23.16%

-12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

32.62%

-19.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

35.65%

-19.39%

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGSG.AS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGSG.AS vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison

IGSG.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGSG.AS
iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.61%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGSG.AS and SSO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGSG.AS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGSG.AS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.

IGSG.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. IGSG.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGSG.AS and 0.87% for SSO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGSG.AS and SSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer