IGSG.AS vs. VYM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM).
IGSG.AS and VYM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGSG.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. VYM is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2006. Both IGSG.AS and VYM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGSG.AS or VYM.
Key characteristics
| IGSG.AS | VYM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.47% | 20.51% |
| 1Y Return | 24.30% | 32.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.30% | 9.41% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.94% | 11.17% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.57% | 10.08% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.34 | 3.02 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.14 | 4.30 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.56 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.21 | 5.00 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.44 | 19.86 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.54% | 1.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.09% | 10.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.91% | -56.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.68% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGSG.AS and VYM is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IGSG.AS vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IGSG.AS achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 20.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IGSG.AS having a 10.57% annualized return and VYM not far behind at 10.08%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGSG.AS vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGSG.AS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGSG.AS vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGSG.AS vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
IGSG.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGSG.AS iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.76% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% | 2.78% | 2.81% |
Drawdowns
IGSG.AS vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGSG.AS drawdown since its inception was -32.91%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSG.AS and VYM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGSG.AS vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) is 3.21%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that IGSG.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.