IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IGSG.AS (iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF) and CSPX.AS (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGSG.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSPX.AS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGSG.AS returned 12.01%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for CSPX.AS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGSG.AS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.AS.

Performance

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGSG.AS achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.AS's 11.52% return. Over the past 10 years, IGSG.AS has underperformed CSPX.AS with an annualized return of 12.01%, while CSPX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.

IGSG.AS

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.53%
• 1Y: 21.22%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 12.01%

CSPX.AS

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 5.25%
• YTD: 11.52%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 25.69%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: 14.77%
• 10Y*: 14.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGSG.AS iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF	10.10%	8.59%	18.22%	22.31%	-12.70%	31.66%	4.00%	28.06%	-4.00%	7.54%
CSPX.AS iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF	11.52%	4.00%	33.87%	22.28%	-14.24%	40.26%	7.72%	32.99%	-0.36%	7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IGSG.AS and CSPX.AS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2014	0.90

The correlation between IGSG.AS and CSPX.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGSG.AS

IGSG.AS Risk / Return Rank: 59
IGSG.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IGSG.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
IGSG.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 58
IGSG.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IGSG.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CSPX.AS

CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 70
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGSG.AS	CSPX.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.25	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.06	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	3.57	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.26	12.76	-1.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGSG.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGSG.AS and CSPX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGSG.AS	CSPX.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.25	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	0.96	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.92	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.93	-0.80

Drawdowns

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGSG.AS drawdown since its inception was -44.01%, which is greater than CSPX.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSG.AS and CSPX.AS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGSG.AS	CSPX.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.01%	-33.65%	-10.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.12%	-7.11%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.27%	-23.37%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.27%	-23.37%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.91%	-33.65%	+0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.40%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.77%	-4.28%	-7.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	2.00%	-0.13%

Volatility

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Dow Jones Global Sustainability Screened UCITS ETF (IGSG.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) at 2.59%. This indicates that IGSG.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGSG.AS	CSPX.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	2.59%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.47%	7.37%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.06%	11.26%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.54%	15.13%	-1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.26%	16.05%	+0.21%

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGSG.AS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGSG.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGSG.AS nor CSPX.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGSG.AS and CSPX.AS in my portfolio?

IGSG.AS and CSPX.AS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IGSG.AS or CSPX.AS?

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGSG.AS or CSPX.AS?

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGSG.AS.

What is the main difference between IGSG.AS and CSPX.AS?

IGSG.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while CSPX.AS is S&P 500. IGSG.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGSG.AS and 0.07% for CSPX.AS.