IGR vs. RA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IGR (CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund) and RA (Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.) are both mutual funds - IGR is a REIT fund managed by CBRE, while RA is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Brookfield. Over the past 5 years, IGR returned 0.19%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for RA. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGR charges 0.04%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for RA.

Performance

IGR vs. RA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGR achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than RA's 3.52% return.

IGR

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -2.76%
• YTD: 10.92%
• 6M: 15.12%
• 1Y: 0.66%
• 3Y*: 10.99%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: 5.57%

RA

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 3.52%
• 6M: 4.41%
• 1Y: 8.85%
• 3Y*: 2.83%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGR vs. RA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund	10.92%	5.24%	1.19%	15.91%	-35.51%	52.83%	-5.27%	41.04%	-15.51%	17.32%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	3.52%	8.32%	15.87%	-9.02%	-13.47%	32.35%	-4.17%	24.89%	-9.15%	15.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IGR and RA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2016	0.38

Return for Risk

IGR vs. RA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGR

IGR Risk / Return Rank: 3
IGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

RA

RA Risk / Return Rank: 16
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGR vs. RA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGR	RA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	1.04	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.18	1.56	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.20	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	1.32	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.10	3.59	-3.49

IGR vs. RA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the RA Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGR and RA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGR vs. RA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGR drawdown since its inception was -87.17%, which is greater than RA's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGR and RA.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGR	RA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.17%	-50.66%	-36.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.14%	-6.73%	-9.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.54%	-28.42%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.61%	-30.83%	-16.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.71%	-3.05%	-8.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.46%	-8.06%	-16.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.59%	2.47%	+4.12%

Volatility

IGR vs. RA - Volatility Comparison

CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) at 1.74%. This indicates that IGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGR	RA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	1.74%	+3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.48%	6.65%	+7.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.73%	8.52%	+10.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.77%	17.57%	+7.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.48%	20.60%	+3.88%

IGR vs. RA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGR has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RA's 2.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGR vs. RA - Dividend Comparison

IGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.00%, more than RA's 11.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund	16.00%	16.44%	14.97%	15.38%	12.22%	6.13%	8.72%	7.48%	9.74%	7.58%	8.84%	7.46%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	11.15%	10.93%	10.63%	16.74%	14.79%	11.31%	13.39%	11.19%	12.52%	10.22%	0.89%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGR and RA in my portfolio?

IGR and RA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGR or RA?

IGR has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to RA (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGR dropped -87.17% vs RA's -50.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.