PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGPT vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGPT vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 72.49% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 20.20% return. Over the past 10 years, IGPT has outperformed XT with an annualized return of 22.30%, while XT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.70% annualized return.


IGPT

1D
0.39%
1M
28.39%
YTD
72.49%
6M
75.56%
1Y
123.95%
3Y*
43.05%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
22.30%

XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
72.49%31.55%17.15%27.29%-27.73%-11.79%54.31%35.06%16.38%34.60%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-4.93%33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and XT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.82

The correlation between IGPT and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGPT vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGPT
XT

Technology

73.9%
43.5%

Communication Services

15.6%
5.2%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.0%

Healthcare

3.6%
23.4%

Industrials

3.1%
10.1%

Financial Services

1.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Technology

IGPT
73.9%
XT
43.5%

Communication Services

IGPT
15.6%
XT
5.2%

Real Estate

IGPT
3.9%
XT
0.0%

Healthcare

IGPT
3.6%
XT
23.4%

Industrials

IGPT
3.1%
XT
10.1%

Financial Services

IGPT
1.3%
XT
3.3%

Basic Materials

IGPT

-

XT
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IGPT

-

XT
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

IGPT

-

XT
0.0%

Energy

IGPT

-

XT
0.3%

Utilities

IGPT

-

XT
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGPT vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT
IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGPTXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.48

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.47

4.41

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.16

18.51

+10.65

IGPT vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 4.39, which is higher than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGPTXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39

2.89

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.41

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.73

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.66

-0.02

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGPTXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.14%

-34.41%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.68%

-10.45%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-22.09%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.87%

-34.41%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.14%

-34.41%

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.47%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-7.41%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

2.49%

+1.78%

Volatility

IGPT vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 12.51% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGPTXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

4.85%

+7.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.50%

11.94%

+11.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.42%

15.99%

+12.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.66%

20.76%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.33%

20.08%

+6.25%

IGPT vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGPT vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than XT's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%1.41%6.21%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.15%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGPT and XT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGPT has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 10-year performance, IGPT leads with 22.30% vs 14.70% for XT. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 22.30% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGPT.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.03% for IGPT.

IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGPT and 0.46% for XT.

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGPT and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer