IGPT vs. PBOT
IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. IGPT is passively managed, while PBOT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IGPT charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.
Performance
IGPT vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 50.51% return, which is significantly higher than PBOT's 26.50% return.
IGPT
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- 6M
- 36.61%
- YTD
- 50.51%
- 1Y
- 80.58%
- 3Y*
- 37.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 19.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.04%
PBOT
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.39M | $21.86M | $21.83M | |
| $30.33K | $29.64K | $24.21K |
IGPT vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 50.51% | 5.28% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 26.50% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGPT and PBOT is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGPT vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank
IGPT
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGPT vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGPT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGPT vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and PBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGPT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.14% | -15.78% | -34.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.20% | -6.04% | -11.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.95% | -4.52% | -7.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.56% | — | — |
Volatility
IGPT vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGPT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.96% | 26.96% | +10.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 26.96% | +2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 26.96% | +0.35% |
IGPT vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGPT vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison
IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PBOT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.08% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGPT and PBOT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.
PBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.01% for IGPT.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.70% for PBOT.
Find the right allocation for IGPT and PBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer