IGPT vs. GTEK

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IGPT is passively managed, while GTEK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGPT returned 37.07%/yr vs 30.01%/yr for GTEK. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGPT charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GTEK.

Performance

IGPT vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 62.05% return, which is significantly higher than GTEK's 43.93% return.

IGPT

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -0.92%
• 6M: 54.14%
• YTD: 62.05%
• 1Y: 95.77%
• 3Y*: 37.07%
• 5Y*: 14.91%
• 10Y*: 21.01%

GTEK

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 37.67%
• YTD: 43.93%
• 1Y: 61.00%
• 3Y*: 30.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	62.05%	31.55%	17.15%	27.29%	-27.73%	-11.04%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	43.93%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-46.73%	-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and GTEK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.90

The correlation between IGPT and GTEK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGPT vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGPT	GTEK
Technology	78.9%	74.5%
Communication Services	13.2%	3.7%
Real Estate	2.9%	2.3%
Healthcare	2.5%	1.1%
Industrials	2.5%	8.1%
Financial Services	0.1%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IGPT vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT

IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 92
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 82
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGPT	GTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.06	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.61	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.34	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.77	5.51	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.27	16.03	+3.23

IGPT vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, smaller than the maximum GTEK drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and GTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGPT	GTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.14%	-53.77%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.68%	-11.13%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.30%	-27.49%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.86%	-8.53%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.94%	-26.98%	+15.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	3.82%	+1.17%

Volatility

IGPT vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a higher volatility of 16.70% compared to Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) at 11.82%. This indicates that IGPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGPT	GTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.70%	11.82%	+4.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.05%	26.11%	+4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.95%	29.70%	+5.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.13%	28.82%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.06%	28.82%	-1.76%

IGPT vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGPT vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	0.01%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	6.21%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGPT and GTEK in my portfolio?

IGPT and GTEK have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGPT or GTEK?

IGPT has higher volatility (16.70%) compared to GTEK (11.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

Which ETF is better, IGPT or GTEK?

On 3-year performance, IGPT leads with 37.07% vs 30.01% for GTEK. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, GTEK has been the lower-risk option at 11.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGPT or GTEK?

Over the 3-year period, IGPT has performed better with a 37.07% return vs 30.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGPT or GTEK?

IGPT is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGPT or GTEK?

IGPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between IGPT and GTEK?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for IGPT and 0.75% for GTEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.