IGPT vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IGPT is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, IGPT returned 123.95% vs 226.72% for AIS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGPT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

IGPT vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGPT achieves a 72.49% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 118.61% return.

IGPT

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 28.39%
• YTD: 72.49%
• 6M: 75.56%
• 1Y: 123.95%
• 3Y*: 43.05%
• 5Y*: 15.89%
• 10Y*: 22.30%

AIS

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 35.87%
• YTD: 118.61%
• 6M: 122.65%
• 1Y: 226.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGPT vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	72.49%	31.55%	-5.83%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	118.61%	58.35%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IGPT and AIS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.92

The correlation between IGPT and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGPT vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGPT	AIS
Technology	73.9%	84.6%
Communication Services	15.6%	-
Real Estate	3.9%	-
Healthcare	3.6%	-
Industrials	3.1%	8.9%
Financial Services	1.3%	-0.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

IGPT vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGPT

IGPT Risk / Return Rank: 94
IGPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
IGPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
IGPT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
IGPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
IGPT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGPT vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGPT	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.39	6.34	-1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.95	5.78	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.80	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.47	14.41	-6.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.16	47.43	-18.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGPT vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGPT Sharpe Ratio is 4.39, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGPT and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGPT	AIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.39	6.34	-1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	3.24	-2.61

Drawdowns

IGPT vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGPT drawdown since its inception was -50.14%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGPT and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGPT	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.14%	-32.78%	-17.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.68%	-15.84%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-5.45%	-6.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	4.80%	-0.53%

Volatility

IGPT vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) is 12.51%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that IGPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGPT	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.51%	16.12%	-3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.50%	29.95%	-6.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.42%	36.00%	-7.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.66%	38.04%	-10.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.33%	38.04%	-11.71%

IGPT vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGPT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGPT vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

IGPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	1.41%	6.21%	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGPT and AIS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IGPT and AIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IGPT or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to IGPT (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGPT dropped -50.14% vs AIS's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, IGPT or AIS?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 226.72% vs 123.95% for IGPT. On fees, IGPT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IGPT has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGPT or AIS?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 226.72% return vs 123.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGPT or AIS?

IGPT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGPT or AIS?

IGPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between IGPT and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IGPT and 0.75% for AIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs 4.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.