PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGME vs. EIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGME vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGME achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly lower than EIPI's 14.76% return.


IGME

1D
-1.63%
1M
3.03%
YTD
13.80%
6M
6.49%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EIPI

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
14.76%
6M
15.05%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGME vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IGME and EIPI is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGME vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGME
IGME Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGME Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGME vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGMEEIPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.37

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

5.10

-4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

14.71

-13.67

IGME vs. EIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the EIPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGME and EIPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGME vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGME drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than EIPI's maximum drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGME and EIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMEEIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.33%

-12.33%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.70%

-4.00%

-21.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.30%

-2.44%

-11.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.41%

-1.67%

-12.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.23%

1.38%

+10.85%

Volatility

IGME vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) at 3.18%. This indicates that IGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMEEIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

3.18%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

7.25%

+12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.22%

9.50%

+25.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.18%

13.02%

+22.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.18%

13.02%

+22.16%

IGME vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGME has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGME vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison

IGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.25%, more than EIPI's 6.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
6.77%9.71%6.31%
IGME
Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF
87.25%69.25%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGME and EIPI have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGME has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to EIPI (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGME dropped -26.33% vs EIPI's -12.33%.

On 1-year performance, EIPI leads with 20.32% vs 10.17% for IGME. On fees, IGME is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, EIPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EIPI has performed better with a 20.32% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGME is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

IGME has the higher dividend yield at 87.25%, compared with 6.77% for EIPI.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for IGME and 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGME and EIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer