IGM vs. TRUT
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IGM is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
IGM vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGM vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 12.72% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and TRUT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
TRUT
IGM vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 2.39 | -1.91 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -18.55% | -47.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.46% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -5.17% | -10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | — | — |
Volatility
IGM vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 21.53% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 21.53% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 21.53% | +3.01% |
IGM vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, IGM and TRUT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for IGM and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer