IGM vs. SPMO
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 25.19%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for SPMO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGM charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
IGM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IGM having a 31.32% return and SPMO slightly lower at 30.35%. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 25.19%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.95% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
IGM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and SPMO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IGM and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGM vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGM
SPMO
Communication Services
IGM
SPMO
Financial Services
IGM
SPMO
Industrials
IGM
SPMO
Energy
IGM
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
SPMO
Basic Materials
IGM
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
SPMO
Healthcare
IGM
-
SPMO
Real Estate
IGM
-
SPMO
Utilities
IGM
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
SPMO
IGM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 3.64 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 14.17 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 2.62 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 1.27 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.01 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -30.95% | -34.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -12.70% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -20.13% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -22.74% | -17.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -30.95% | -9.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | 0.00% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -4.60% | -10.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 3.26% | +1.41% |
Volatility
IGM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 6.10%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 7.35% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 14.39% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 17.64% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 19.30% | +6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 20.31% | +4.23% |
IGM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 20.95% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 20.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGM.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGM and 0.13% for SPMO.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer